Print
Lawrence Farley writes regarding Colossians 2:8-9:
Christ is not just one link in the Fullness of the Godhead’s series of emanations. All the Divine Fullness dwells in Him. And not only that, but the Divine Fullness dwells in Him bodily. It is not, as the Gnostics asserted, that the true Divine Nature would not deign to soil Itself with contact with the bodily; corruptible world. On the contrary, the Fullness of God has actually assumed a body, sharing our physical nature.
Meditating on this passage from Colossians and from Farley’s reflections, there are two things that confront me. First, is of course the importance of my human body. God himself was pleased to take on a body like ours and in that there is great impetus to care for my own body. This point of impetus is related to the second confrontation I experienced. Elsewhere Paul will write about offering our bodies as living sacrifices (Rom 12:1-2) and we find Jesus concerned in the Gospels not only with what our body does but also with what our minds (in connection with our bodies) think.
Insofar as we participate in Christ, we participate in one who has a body that is perfect. That is, he has a body that fulfills the purpose for which human bodies were created and the destination that human bodies in Christ are headed. In other words, Christ’s body then provides for us a cosmic goal and direction. And so when I sin in body or mind, in things done or in things left undone, I do with my body that which is immature, that which is in a direction other than the cosmic final direction that Christ has laid down for us and then raised for us on the other side of death.
Lord, in your mercy, forgive us the use of our bodies for those things that are unlike Jesus, so that we might abide in the fullness of the One person in whom the fullness of the Divine indeed dwells. Amen.
__________
1 Farley, Lawrence. The Prison Epistles, The Orthodox Bible Study Companion Series. (Ben Lomond, Calif.: Conciliar Press, 2003) , p. 171-2. Commenting on Colossians 2:8-9.
Print
1 Therefore, blessed and noble [a] are all the martyrs according to the will of God which has brought them to pass. For it is necessary, being more [b] God-fearing, to ascribe to God power over all things. 2 For at their nobility, fortitude, and love for their Master [c] who should not marvel? After they were torn to shreds with whips, the structure of the flesh became visible even as far as the inner veins and arteries. They held out patiently such that the bystanders took pity and grieved. [d] But while so great a nobility came upon them, so that they neither complained nor groaned something of their situation, they were at the same time demonstrating to us all that the martyrs of Christ, those being tormented, in that hour were absent from the flesh and that to a greater degree the Lord, who was standing with them, was speaking to them.
[a] γενναῖα (γενναι̂ος) is a common epithet of the martyrs (c.f., 4 Macc; 1 Clement 5:1). (BAGD)
[b] This is a use of the comparative form (εὐλαβεσ + τέρους) seems to connect with the μὲν at the beginning of §2.1 but escapes my understanding of its use. Lightfoot does not indicate in his translation a comparative use in his English translation.
[c] φιλοδέσποτον a compound word here Christianized to be a reference to the martyr’s love for Jesus. This picks up on Paul’s language of being a bond-servant or slave of Christ (δοῦλος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ), as seen in Romans 1:1 and elsewhere.
[d] ὀδύρεσθαι (ὀδυρμός) A rare verb in the LXX. Jeremiah 38:14 (LXX), according to TDNT (p 673), employs the word to speak of Ephraim weeping, ἀκοὴν ἤκουσα Εφραιμ ὀδυρομένου. The NRSV renders this “Indeed I heard Ephraim pleading;” however, that does not grasp the weeping and wailing that constitutes the idea of ὀδυρμός. The Hebrew there is שָׁמ֣וֹעַ שָׁמַ֗עְתִּי אֶפְרַ֙יִם֙ מִתְנוֹדֵ֔ד, which I render, “I heard Ephraim wandering in grief…”
Print
Parts: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
The Received Greek Text |
The Received Latin Text |
| σαρκὸς ἀνάστασιν, ξωὴν αἰώνιον. Ἀμήν. | carnis resurrectionem; vitam æternam. Amen. |
the resurrection of the body, [1] and life eternal. [2] Amen.
[1] σαρκὸς (σάρξ) is the word St. John uses to speak of the Incarnation where the Logos became flesh (ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο, Jn 1:14). This is the flesh that was just like ours. The difference between us and Jesus is that Jesus overcame sin, and swallowed up death by his own death. τοῦτο γινώσκοντες ὅτι ὁ παλαιὸς ἡμῶν ἄνθρωπος συνεσταυρώθη, ἵνα καταργηθῇ τὸ σῶμα τῆς ἁμαρτίας, τοῦ μηκέτι δουλεύειν ἡμᾶς τῇ ἁμαρτίᾳ· “This we know, that our outmoded self was crucified with him with the result that the body of sin was sacked, that we would no longer be enslaved to sin.” (Ro 6:6, author’s translation)
[2] αἰώνιον (αἰώνιος) that is, life without beginning or end, timeless, eternal. This is the kind of life that Jesus possessed as the Second Person of the Trinity. It is the kind of life that swallowed whole the condemned life that humanity ekes out as a result of the Fall and sin. It is the life that a New Humanity, one rooted in Christ Jesus participates in by mystical union, Christ giving himself to his people via means of grace, (e.g., the Word, sacraments and prayer).
Print
As a sort of punctuation (!) to the series just finished on Romans 12:1-2, Participation and Transformation, which dealt with Sanctification and Christian Imagination, I wanted to post this You-Tube video, echoing its parody. While it is a parody, it saddens me deeply that what it spoofs is in fact an increasingly present disposition in the Churches of Jesus Christ - at least in America. Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, have mercy upon us.
Print
God in his mercies gave us in Christ Jesus a new mind a new set of desires that are beyond what we could imagine before. Paul is urging us on here to that greater immeasurable Christian imagination. Now why do I put it like that?
Lewis put it something like this:
Indeed, if we consider the unblushing promises of reward and the staggering nature of the rewards promised in the Gospels, it would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.[1]
We are far too easily pleased, indeed. We come to worship Christ, the River of Life, on Sundays content to drink of him with eyedroppers and shot glasses, when he bids us to drink of his inexhaustible grace. We come expecting to hear a good sermon that tickles our ears and maybe makes us laugh when Christ is here presenting himself to us boundlessly, strengthening those of us who confess our weakness and sin. We pray that God would make our lives more convenient when He has bound himself to us for the purpose of walking with us through valleys of thick darkness to lift us beyond the mountain tops of our own imaginations.
1See what love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God; and that is what we are. The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. 2Beloved, we are God’s children now; what we will be has not yet been revealed. What we do know is this: when he is revealed, we will be like him, for we will see him as he is. 3And all who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure. (1 Jn 3:1-3 NRSV)
You see, Jesus would give us himself, endlessly, and we settle for a diluted version because we don’t, won’t or can’t imagine the full throttled love that God demonstrates for us as he grows us up. The joy of renewing our minds and offering our bodies according to the holy, pleasing and telic purpose of God for us is that we have fellowship with him now as he grows us up in our faith that could not be imagined apart from Jesus Christ.
But what could it be like for us? Would you imagine for a moment what life might be like with a participation in Christ Jesus deeper still? What would it be like in your life, in the life of your church to have a greater purity of fellowship with Jesus as you would participate with him in the purification of your bodies and minds? Not only would there be transformation in this present time - now - but we would participate in the very telic purpose of God for us as human beings.
[1] Lewis, Clive Staples. The Weight of Glory. (New York: HarperCollins, 2001), 26.
Print
Paul had written to the church at Rome. That church had some life in it in its own right. He was hashing out some of the main points of the Gospel for them and he turns to urge these good Christian people towards their created purpose. In the language of the Westminster Confession we might summarize this call or urging the Apostle Paul makes as, “I urge you to be sanctified in body and mind for that is the most human thing you can do!”
But if we’re not careful, if we don’t take the context and what has come before Romans 12:1-2 in to consideration, we might miss the very basis by which Paul expects Christians to grow in grace in demonstrating more clearly the likeness of God in greater fellowship with Him.
There are two indicators in the passage that I want you to recognize. The first and most obvious is the word translated “therefore”. That clues us in that Paul’s assertions about mind-body sanctification are predicated upon or assume more basic building blocks of faith.
The second indicator is the phrase translated “by the mercies of God.” The word here for “mercies” or “compassions” is a word unique to Paul excepting one occurrence in the Epistle to the Hebrews and it points us back to the ideas in the previous chapters of the Epistle. There we find that God was not content to give everyone over to the lusts of their flesh to defile their bodies and demonstrate their minds as failed.
God in his mercies was pleased to change the very desire structure of our hearts. In binding us to Christ by faith alone we have been justified as Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.
Print
In my study of Romans 12:1-2, the consideration of sanctification of course is at the fore. I was encouraged by what A. A. Hodge had written in his commentary on the Westminster Confession of Faith. “Regeneration,” Hodge writes, “is the commencement of sanctification, and sanctification is the completion of the work commenced in regeneration.” Hodge reminds us that sanctification is a “gracious work of God” in which the Holy Spirit applies “the grace secured through the mediation of the Son” by distinctly inward and outward means. 1
Faith of course is the inward means of sanctification, “the organ of our union with Christ and fellowship with his Spirit.” 2
The outward means of sanctification are four according to Hodge:
Hodge reminds us that sanctification is the believer’s participation with the work of the Holy Spirit to transform her or him. In Hodge’s own words:
It must be remembered that while the subject is passive with respect to that divine act of grace whereby he is regenerated, after he is regenerated he cooperates with the Holy Ghost in the work of sanctification. The Holy Ghost gives the grace, and prompts and directs in its exercise, and the soul exercises it. Thus, while sanctification is a grace, it is also a duty; and the soul is both bound and encouraged to use with diligence, in dependence upon the Holy Spirit, all the means for its spiritual renovation, and to form those habits of resisting evil and of right action in which sanctification so largely consists. 3
One of the most clear pictures of this participation with God in his work with us is seen in the Lord’s Supper. This is in no way to lift the Lord’s Supper over the Word, as I agree with Hodge’s priority in the list above. But it is to say that when Christ presents himself to us in the Bread and Wine, he is with his people in a way that is like no other in this age between the Advents. In partaking of Christ in the Eucharist we do show forth his death we in worthy reception of the elements by faith are “made partakers of his body and blood, with all his benefits, to [our] spiritual nourishment and growth in grace.” 4
The word Eucharist, historically used in reference to the Lord’s Supper, is the English cognate from the Greek εὐχαριστία (eucharistia) meaning thanksgiving or thankfulness. The Eucharist then has equity and power today for us as Reformed Christians. The Eucharist is a taste of glory to come, for he who has justified his people, will glorify them and the only way between justification and glorification is through the country of sanctification on the Road Christ. The Eucharist is not merely a picture reminding us of a time in which Jesus died for our sins, but is the resurrected and exalted Christ giving himself to us now to strengthen and walk with us in the midst of our sanctification, our great existential battle with sin. That is immeasurably much to be thankful for.
_____
1 A.A. Hodge et al., The Confession of Faith : With Questions for Theological Students and Bible Classes (With an appendix on Presbyterianism by Charles Hodge. Index created by Christian Classics Foundation.;, electronic ed. based on the 1992 Banner of Truth reprint.; Simpsonville SC: Christian Classics Foundation, 1996), 195.
2Ibid.
3Ibid., 196.
4Westminster Shorter Catechism, Question 96.
Print
When Paul pens Romans 12:1-2, he has in mind the unspeakable, immeasurable wonder of what is ours in Jesus Christ. Jesus is the man that has already experienced resurrection and brings that life giving purpose from the future into this world here and now.
We who are in Christ, who is himself the image of God in whom the likeness of God dwells with perfect fellowship, are being remade in our whole person to fulfill the purpose of God in all that we are, in both mind and body. We, who have demonstrated ourselves worthy of death, are finding that Christ has transcended death, swallowed it whole and now lives in us to root out the sticky residue that the realm of death has left behind in us.
It is out of this great flood of divine compassion that Paul writes:
1 Therefore, I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, through the compassions of God to present your bodies as sacrifices living, holy and acceptable to God as your spiritual service. 2 Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of the mind in order that you might prove what the will of God is, the good and acceptable and telic. (Rom 12:1-2, author’s translation)
God’s will is good, acceptable and telic. There is really not a great English word to translate what is usually rendered “perfect” from the Greek. Perfection in the biblical sense, has to do with doing everything according to design, according to the purpose for which a thing was created.
These verses are the answering echo, the antithesis of what he wrote in the first chapter of this Epistle. There he gave us a warning and condemnation, that though we were created as the image of God to demonstrate the likeness of God while walking in fellowship with Him, all of humanity without distinction (viz. between Jew and Gentile) has proven itself otherwise.
We have proven ourselves otherwise. Like a Gecko’s tail that has been discharged, humanity - mind and body - writhes twitching, dislocated from our true identity. Knowing God apart from Christ, we too had exchanged the glory of God for images fashioned after our own corrupted imaginations. In lieu of this, Paul writes these very sobering words:
God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts for the purpose of dishonoring their bodies among themselves … since they did not see fit to have a true knowledge of God, he gave them over to a failed mind. (Rom 1:24,28, author’s translation)
So I hope you can see that in both the beginning of the Epistle and here in the beginning of the end of it Paul is concerned with the purpose of humanity as whole persons, body and mind, before God on this earth.
The offering of our bodies to God as spiritual acts of worship stands over against the dishonoring of our bodies.
The renewal of our minds in Christ demonstrates minds that no longer operate in contradiction to the purpose for which they were created, but now in Christ strive to do those things that prove God’s purpose for human beings.
Jesus has redeemed us. He renews us, mind and body, that we as the image of God, grow up in his likeness, demonstrating our fellowship with him, his goodness, pleasure and perfection (telos).
Print
There is a garden in her face,
Where roses and white lilies blow. [1]
If you’re like me when you read just those two lines of poetry you probably spent as much energy if not more trying to fight off ridiculous images of flowers growing out of the pores of a woman’s face as you did trying to imagine what Thomas Campion was actually describing in his poem, There Is A Garden in Her Face.
Dorothy Sayers, a colleague of C. S. Lewis, quotes Campion in making the point that the modern day person generally has great difficulty with poetry, figures and symbols. We don’t like them because they ask more of us than we have the faculties to appreciate. We tend to like the things that can be measured and then exhausted; yet, poets and prophets have given us figures and symbols that move us beyond ourselves - to something beyond the maximum.
This seems to be true in the way we approach church and worship, in the way we order our lives, in the way we think about happiness and fulfillment, and particularly in the way we think of and relate to Jesus, our Lord. Writing to those who misunderstood the figures in Dante’s Paradiso, his work on Heaven, Sayers writes:
… one of the results of having substituted a philosophy of becoming for a philosophy of being is that the very notion of an achieved happiness has become not merely inconceivable but actually repugnant to us. Timelessness, or eternity, like Heaven itself, passes man’s understanding.2]
What Sayers writes about Paridiso applies to our approach to Romans 12:1-2 with its figures and symbols. In lusting after the measurable and exhaustible we have begun to think of the Christian faith in such terms. We have reduced Christianity down to mere propositions and steps and functions. The consequence is that the way we think about God, Christ, his Cross and even ourselves has become frozen still, comatose, even demonstrating a spiritual rigormortis of sorts.
Many of us come to the Apostle Paul’s writings and we resonate with the structure of his argumentation. But let us not forget that Paul wrote as an Apostle not because he studied hard enough or tried harder than anybody else, but because God in His mysterious providence was pleased to irrupt into the Apostle Paul’s life and change everything here and now with a view towards eternity.
We are given that paradigm at the beginning of his Epistle to the Romans where Paul reminds us that he is a servant of Jesus set apart for the gospel of God
… concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh 4 and was declared to be Son of God with power according to the spirit of holiness by resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, (Rom 1:3-4, NRSV)
God had come to earth in the flesh of Jesus Christ, the God-Man. In his perfect human life, Jesus lifted his new humanity to a place so great that sinners clutching to our failed depravity cannot imagine or measure or exhaust it. He has lifted us back to a place of integration and fellowship with God in himself.
Jesus Christ, Paul reminds us, was declared with power to be the Son of God on account of his resurrection from the dead, which demonstrated his life before the grave as perfect.
But resurrections don’t happen all the time do they? Scripture teaches us that all but a few resurrections will happen at the end of time, when Jesus Christ, the Son of the living God, will judge the living and the dead.
Paul is telling us that something of the future has broken into the past and changed everything.
[1] Campion, Thomas. Campion’s Works. Percival Vivian, Ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909. 178. Quoted in Dorothy L. Sayers “Introduction” to Dante’s Paradiso, (London: Penguin Books, 2004), 28.
[2] Sayers, 28.
Print
1 Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, through the compassion [a] of God to present your bodies as sacrifices living, holy and acceptable to God as your spiritual service. 2 Do not be conformed [b] to this age, but be transformed [c] by the renewing [d] of the mind in order that you might discern what the will of God is, the good and acceptable and telic. [e]
[a] οἰκτιρμῶν is used only a handful of times by Paul in the NT (Rom 12:1; 2 Cor 1:3; Phil 2:1;
[b] συσχηματίζεσθε is only used twice in the NT (Rom 12:2; 1 Pet 1:14), both times in the negative, and in no other Christian corpus inspired or otherwise of which I am aware. This notion of not being conformed is always with regard to the sphere of sinfulness (the world outwardly or our own lust inwardly). It always occurs in juxtaposition with the concept of being transformed into the holiness of God (c.f., 1 Pet 1:15-16).
[c] μεταμορφοῦσθε is of course the word from which we get the English cognate metamorphosis. However, the use of this word in the NT far transcends the idea of mere change. The NT uses μεταμορφόω with a view towards a very specific eschatological telos. The word is used of Christ when he is transfigured before Peter, James and John (Matt 17:2; Mark 9:2). The other two instances of the word in the NT occur in Paul, both describing the holiness of Christ to which his followers are being transformed in union with Him (Rom 12:2; 2 Cor 3:18). In short, μεταμορφόω would appear to be clearly an extension of the participation in Christ that believers share.
[d] ἀνακαινώσει in the NT describes the Spiritual renewal of a person. It is used only here in Rom 12:2 and in Titus 3:5.
[e] τέλειον is a word that does not go well into English. It is usually translated as perfect or complete; however, both of those translations do not capture the purposed and planned aspect of the word. I.e., the completion in view is one that is the result of everything occurring according to plan. So I have decided to go with the transliteration.