Nielsen’s Nook

Nielsen’s Nook
Nielsen’s Nook
Contemplative, reflective, and irenic we pray.
Print Print

The New York Times reported today that those convicted of raping children may no longer be executed for their crime. I am generally not very excited about the death penalty as a form of punishment; however, the reasons given in this article made my stomach turn.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a law that allows the execution of people convicted of a raping a child.

In a 5-4 vote, the court said the Louisiana law allowing the death penalty to be imposed in such cases violates the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

”The death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion. His four liberal colleagues joined him, while the four more conservative justices dissented.

There has not been an execution in the United States for a crime that did not also involve the death of the victim in 44 years.

Patrick Kennedy, 43, was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter in Louisiana. He is one of two people in the United States, both in Louisiana, who have been condemned to death for a rape that was not also accompanied by a killing.

The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case in which the victim was an adult woman.

Forty-five states ban the death penalty for any kind of rape, and the other five states allow it for child rapists. Kennedy’s case is the only time a state has sought to execute someone. Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas allow executions in such cases if the defendant had previously been convicted of raping a child.

Did you catch it? If you don’t kill someone’s body, the taking of your life is not permitted because to take your life when you have not killed another’s body is cruel and unusual.  I suspect that these justices have never been raped, certainly not as children - and certainly not by their own parents!

While I have never been raped either, I have dealt with those who have been raped as children. People, who in their fifties, are still trying to pick up the pieces, fighting suicide every moment of every day. It seems cruel and unusual to rape a child. It seems light-weight to give such a perpetrator the death penalty. Rapists may spare the body, though sometimes they don’t do that either. However, they take what cannot be returned, they lacerate the soul and only miracle surgery can heal such wounds and even then the scars are more than many can bear.

I would suggest that a materialist world view has circumscribed this Supreme Court decision. One that sees death as merely a material bodily matter, and has turned a blind eye to the psychological and spiritual suffering that will accompany the rape victims for the rest of their lives.

Lord have mercy upon us, especially those who suffer in ways we’ll never know.

View blog authority